By Axel Gelfert
Covering latest literature and significant debates, A severe advent to Testimony discusses the epistemic prestige of testimony-based ideals, relates alterations to appropriate advancements in different parts and provides a serious standpoint on present and destiny learn traits. Devoting house to either the functions of social epistemology and the bigger conceptual problems with wisdom, Gelfert not just introduces the epistemology of testimony; he bargains an updated advent to epistemology. built with a mixture of examine questions, examples, and proposals for additional analyzing, scholars of latest epistemology will locate this a competent consultant to learning testimony as a resource of knowledge.
Read Online or Download A Critical Introduction to Testimony PDF
Similar epistemology books
This quantity collects 4 released articles by way of the overdue Tamara Horowitz and unpublished papers on selection conception: "Making Rational judgements whilst personal tastes Cycle" and the monograph-length "The Backtracking Fallacy. " An advent is equipped via editor Joseph Camp. Horowitz most well-liked to acknowledge the range of rationality, either useful and theoretical rationality.
The talk over foundationalism, the perspective that there exists a few safe starting place upon which to construct a method of wisdom, appears to be like to were resolved and the antifoundationalists have at the least quickly prevailed. From a firmly old process, the e-book strains the foundationalism/antifoundationalism controversy within the paintings of many very important figures—Animaxander, Aristotle and Plato, Augustine, Descartes, Hegel and Nietzsche, Habermas and Chisholm, and others—throughout the historical past of philosophy.
Within the preface to his "Philosophical Investigations" Ludwig Wittgenstein expresses pessimism in regards to the tradition of his time and doubts as to if his rules will be understood in one of these time: 'I lead them to public with uncertain emotions. it isn't very unlikely that it's going to fall to the lot of this paintings, in its poverty and within the darkness of this time, to convey mild into one mind or one other - yet, in fact, it's not likely'.
- The Transcendental How: Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Objective Cognition (Stockholm Studies in Philosophy)
- Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II
- Departing from Frege: Essays in the Philosophy of Language (International Library of Philosophy)
- Inference to the Best Explanation (International Library of Philosophy)
- After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology (ASA Monographs)
- Heidegger und Husserl
Additional info for A Critical Introduction to Testimony
A working knowledge of one’s social environment, and of the pathways by which we receive the testimony of others, will therefore have an important role to play in deciding whether to accept or reject a given claim. 4. Broad and narrow definitions of testimony Having presented a number of examples of testimony and having noted some of the peculiarities that afflict different kinds of testimony, let us now look at how philosophers have tried to give some unity to this diversity. In particular, we will be looking at broad and narrow definitions of testimony, and their respective shortcomings, before exploring alternative (intermediate) views in the next section.
And is directed to those who are in need of evidence on the matter. (Coady 1992: 42) Although explicitly put forward as a definition of ‘natural testimony’, intended to capture ‘the conventions governing the speech act of testifying’, the narrow view remains indebted to formal conceptions of testimony – not least by assimilating testimony to the (legal) category of ‘evidence’. Talk of ‘evidence’ suggests that an objective relationship of support must exist, or must at least be presumed by the hearer to hold, between the act of stating that p and it actually being the case that p.
Talk of ‘evidence’ suggests that an objective relationship of support must exist, or must at least be presumed by the hearer to hold, between the act of stating that p and it actually being the case that p. ) Upon closer inspection, the narrow view in its above formulation might be deemed to contain some redundancy. Clause (3), in particular, is the conjunction of two conditions, since it demands both relevance to an open WHAT IS TESTIMONY? 33 question and targeted presentation of the testimony to those ‘in need of evidence on the matter’.