By John Hick (auth.)
This brief publication is a full of life discussion among a non secular believer and a skeptic. It covers the entire major concerns together with diverse principles of God, the nice and undesirable in faith, spiritual event and neuroscience, ache and discomfort, demise and lifestyles after demise, and comprises attention-grabbing autobiographical revelations.
Read or Download Between Faith and Doubt: Dialogues on Religion and Reason PDF
Similar religious books
In eighty five new and up to date essays, this complete quantity offers an authoritative consultant to the philosophy of faith. contains contributions from validated philosophers and emerging stars22 new entries have now been additional, and all fabric from the former variation has been up-to-date and reorganizedBroad assurance spans the components of worldwide religions, theism, atheism, , the matter of evil, technology and faith, and ethics
The research of early cognitive improvement has emphasised the way little ones act like scientists, trying out and revising theories concerning the actual, organic, and mental international. proof of this early realizing of the usual order has led researchers to reassess kid's brooding about magical, spiritual, or differently supernatural orders.
Contemporary findings in cognitive technology and evolutionary psychology offer very important insights to the techniques which make non secular ideals and behaviors such effective attractors in and throughout numerous cultural settings. the explicit salience of non secular rules relies at the undeniable fact that they're 'counter-intuitive': they contradict our intuitive expectancies of ways entities more often than not behave.
- The Church in Council: Conciliar Movements, Religious Practice and the Papacy from Nicea to Vatican II (International Library of Historical Studies)
- The Blood of Martyrs: Unintended Consequences of Ancient Violence
Extra resources for Between Faith and Doubt: Dialogues on Religion and Reason
It's not a hypothesis at all. It is in the same category as other fundamental beliefs which are not based on inference from evidence but on direct experience. DAVID: Such as? JOHN: Well to start with, we are directly aware of the content of our present visual field. We don't infer it - there is nothing to infer it from - and we can't offer any evidence for it. The only evidence is itself. In other words, it doesn't need any evidence and isn't capable of any. JOHN: 56 Between Faith and Doubt DAVID: True, but what beyond that?
But obviously only one at most can be, so that to affirm one is by implication to reject all the others. So each is rejected by a majority vote! Or, as our friend David Hume put it, if a judge hears several witnesses each of whom contradicts the others, he will disregard them all. l And this is what I do with the witness of the religions. Each contradicts the others, so I dismiss them all. JOHN: And given the traditional concept of God, I don't blame you. But the whole situation changes within the quite different framework of the philosophy of religion I'm advocating.
And even those who live in miserable conditions - half-starving, or wickedly exploited for others' profit, or with the wasting disease of AIDS, and so on - even they have their share of life and love and beauty, even if it's often a very small share. It's remarkable what fortitude people often show even amid terrible poverty, and it's inspiring to see how they often care for one another even in the direst circumstances. We shouldn't write off any life as not worth living. All human life is good in some degree, even though the degrees do, as you say, vary enormously.